CONFIRMED! 5G Forced Installation In Schools Nationwide During COVID-19 Lockdown
Guys, you need to get involved and do anything you can to spread this information. NOT just the video but the information. Stop people on the streets and tell them. CALL your friends and tell them. Put it on Twitter and ALL social networks. WE CAN DO THIS!
Learn More: Click on Link:
“The truth about mobile phone and wireless radiation” — Dr Devra Davis
“The truth about mobile phone and wireless radiation: what we know, what we need to find out, and what you can do now”
Presented by Dr Devra Davis, Visiting Professor of Medicine at the Hebrew University Hadassah Medical School, and Visiting Professor of Medicine at Ondokuz Mayis University, Turkey.
The Lecture
What are the health effects of mobile phones and wireless radiation? While Australia has led the world in safety standards, including compulsory seat-belt legislation, plain packaging on cigarettes, and product and food disclosure legislation, it falls behind in addressing the significant issues associated with mobile phone use. In this Dean’s Lecture, epidemiologist and electromagnetic radiation expert, Dr Devra Davis, will outline the evolution of the mobile phone and smartphone, and provide a background to the current 19 year old radiation safety standards (SAR), policy developments and international legislation. New global studies on the health consequences of mobile/wireless radiation will be presented, including children’s exposure and risks.
The Speaker
Dr Devra Davis is an internationally recognised expert on electromagnetic radiation from mobile phones and other wireless transmitting devices. She is currently the Visiting Professor of Medicine at the Hebrew University Hadassah Medical School, and Visiting Professor of Medicine at Ondokuz Mayis University, Turkey. Dr Davis was Founding Director of the Center for Environmental Oncology at The University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute — the first institute of its kind in the world, to examine the environmental factors that contribute to the majority of cases of cancer.
In 2007, Dr Devra Davis founded nonprofit Environmental Health Trust to provide basic research and education about environmental health hazards. Dr Davis served as the President Clinton appointee to the Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board in the U.S.A. from 1994–1999, an independent executive branch agency that investigates, prevents and mitigates chemical accidents.
As the former Senior Advisor to the Assistant Secretary for Health in the Department of Health and Human Services, she has counseled leading officials in the United States, United Nations, European Environment Agency, Pan American Health Organization, World Health Organization, and World Bank.
Dr Davis holds a B.S. in physiological psychology and an M.A. in sociology from the University of Pittsburgh, 1967. She completed a PhD in science studies at the University of Chicago as a Danforth Foundation Graduate Fellow, 1972 and a M.P.H. in epidemiology at the Johns Hopkins University as a Senior National Cancer Institute Post-Doctoral Fellow, 1982. She has authored more than 200 publications and has been published in Lancet and Journal of the American Medical Association as well as the Scientific American and the New York Times.
Dr Devra Davis is an internationally recognised expert on electromagnetic radiation from mobile phones and other wireless transmitting devices.
Learn More: Watch Video:
ARE CELL PHONES REALLY THAT BAD FOR OUR HEALTH?
EMF RADIATION PROTECTION FOR CELL PHONE, TABLET & LAPTOP
The latest breaking news from the FCC is that they are investigating Apple and Samsung for violating Radio Frequency (RF) radiation limits emitted by their cell phones. This is in response to an internal study by the Chicago Tribune that showed RF emissions as much as 5 times the limits set by the US government — limits that have already been criticized for being outdated (established in the 90’s) and overly lenient. A related lawsuit has also been filed against Apple and Samsung.
In addition, new research from the National Toxicology Program (NTP, a division of the National Institutes of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS)) revolves around a common and seemingly non-threatening item, the cell phone.
However, the results are in…. Cell phone radiation does, indeed, have adverse health effects. Ranking as one of the most comprehensive assessments to date; the 25-million-dollar, ten-year government study determined the effects in rats and mice from exposure to radio-frequency (RF) radiation from cell phones. Researchers found increased rates of cancer in male rats exposed to cell phone radiation.
All of your personal electronic devices emit (laptops, cell phones, tablets etc.) Electromagnetic Radiation (EMR), or Electromagnetic Fields (EMF) that are comprised of Extremely Low Frequencies (ELF), Radio Frequencies (RF, Wi-fi, data etc.) and Thermal Radiation (heat), all of which are potentially harmful. Gamma Rays, X-Rays and UV are also types of EMR.
EMR has a high decay rate which means that most of the exposure is felt within a few inches and especially with direct contact. EMR can penetrate most natural and man made materials including wood, plastic, pillows, blankets, clothes etc.
KNOW THE FACTS
Are cellphones bad for our health?
There’s a message in your phone suggesting you carry it 5-15 mm away from your body, to limit exposure to radiation. CBC Marketplace examines the standards and the testing.
Watch Videos:
Learn More: Watch Video:
Check out “Dr. Sunjay Gupta on Cell Phone Radiation” from SafeSleeve on Vimeo.
The video is available for your viewing pleasure at https://vimeo.com/107306727
Check out “Tucker Carlson Fox News on the Dangers of Cell Phone EMF Radiation” from SafeSleeve on Vimeo.
The video is available for your viewing pleasure at https://vimeo.com/394034915
Learn More: Click on Link:
https://www.safesleevecases.com
ID2020 / Coronavirus Vaccine / Mark of the Beast
Learn More: Watch Video:
ΕX DΗS ΕMPLΟΥEE REVEALS ALL IN THIS ΙNTERVΙEW ON THIS CΟMΙNG TECHNOLOGY
ΑNΟNΥMOUS lNSIDΕR shares what we all may face…AND HOW to PRΕPARΕ. ΕX-DΕPΑRTMENT of HΟMΕLΑND SΕC. ΕMPLOYΕΕ TΕLLS ΑLL she experienced with HΕR DΕCLINING health working next to FIVΕ GEE TΕCH! Shocking INTΕRVIΕW on RΕAL WORLD lMPACTS of ΤΗIS CΟMNG TΕCΗNΟLΟGΥ.
Learn More Watch Video:
THE HIDDEN AGENDA FOR THE WORLDWIDE SHUTDOWN
Learn More: Watch Video:
Coronavirus 5G Technology Is NOT Our Friend
Learn More: Watch Video:
Nationwide lockdowns coming over spread of coronavirus as governors order businesses closed and entire cities idled
Sunday, March 15, 2020 by: JD Heyes
(Natural News) If you thought to yourself, “This coronavirus thing doesn’t seem that bad, it’ll blow over soon and life will return to normal,” you may want to rethink that.
As the virus continues to spread and sicken Americans, governors and mayors are responding to demands by state and local officials to shutter businesses and close off entire sections of major cities in an effort to contain the outbreak.
New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio folded to pressure and threats of a “sick-out” by scores of teachers to close NYC schools, even as he considered tougher measures.
“Every option is on the table in a crisis,” he told CNN Sunday, as reported by The Epoch Times. “We’ve never seen anything like this.”
“It’s changing every hour so we’re going to constantly make new decisions,” he said, noting that cases in New York could rise to as many as 1,000 in the coming days.
De Blasio is also said to be considering a lockdown of the Big Apple, though he did not provide many details during his interview.
“So there’s the ability to establish a curfew.
There’s the ability to regulate whether vehicles or individuals may enter or leave specific parts of the city. There is the ability to close down public transportation,” he said, adding that city officials could suspend alcohol consumption, firearms usage and could order people off of streets and out of public places.
He also floated the idea of “nationalizing” certain industries to deal with a “war-time scenario.”
“This is a war-like situation, we are in a war-time scenario with a Mar-a-Lago attitude being used by the federal government,” de Blasio said, a reference to President Trump’s Florida resort.
“If the federal government doesn’t realize this is the equivalent of a war already, there is no way that states and localities can make all the adjustments we need to,” he added.
Meanwhile, the governors of Ohio and Illinois have ordered all bars and restaurants to close, choking off commerce but also providing less opportunity for the virus to spread.
“I’m aware that this will impact many, many good workers,” Republican Gov. Mike DeWine said in a tweet, according to KDKA. “I can’t tell you how sorry I am, but we will work to mitigate the suffering. It is our goal to get everyone through this.”
‘The time for persuasion and public appeals is over’
The order affects in-restaurant and in-bar dining and drinking. They will still be able to do carry-out and deliveries.
“Every day we delay, more people will die,” he said in another tweet. “If we do not act and get some distance between people, our healthcare system in Ohio will not hold up.”
The order remains in effect indefinitely, according to KDKA.
Illinois’ Democratic Gov. JB Pritzker also ordered bars and restaurants closed, effective Monday.
“I cannot let the gravity of the choices prevent us from taking the actions that the science and the experts say will keep people safe,” he said in issuing his order, according to CBSChicago.
“It’s unfortunate that many people didn’t take that seriously,” he added, in response to reports that crowds were packing into bars ahead of St. Patrick’s Day.
“The time for persuasion and public appeals is over. The time for action is here,” Pritzker said. “This is not a joke. No one is immune to this.”
That said, Pritzker noted that the state’s presidential primary elections would be held as scheduled on Tuesday. “If we delayed,” he said, “it is unclear when we would be able to hold another.”
This is all just the beginning, folks. There will be more closures, more emergency orders, and more restrictions on travel and movement.
If you didn’t think it could happen in America, you were wrong.
Sources include:
Source:
5G Criminally Insane Electromagnetic Fields (EMF) Fry Living Things
By Dr. Martin Pall
Dr. Martin Pall, Professor Emeritus of Biochemistry and Basic Medical Sciences at Washington State University. I am a published and widely cited scientist on the biological effects of electromagnetic fields and speak internationally on this topic. I am particularly expert in how wireless radiation impacts the electrical systems in our bodies. I have published 7 studies showing there exists exquisite sensitivity to electromagnetic fields (EMFs) in the voltage sensor in each cell, such that the force impacting our cells at
the voltage sensor has massive impact on the biology on the cells of our bodies.
PDF (4 Pages): Pall-Letter-to-CalLegis-FINAL-8-7-17
Please access my 90 page, seven chapter document on EMF effects, how they are produced in the body and the corruption of the international science:
Chapter 7 from the book:
5G: Great risk for EU, U.S. and International Health! Compelling Evidence for Eight Distinct Types of Great Harm Caused by Electromagnetic Field (EMF) Exposures and the Mechanism that Causes Them
Written and Compiled by Martin L. Pall, PhD, Professor Emeritus of Biochemistry and Basic Medical Sciences, Washington State UniversityAddress: 638 NE 41st Ave., Portland OR 97232 USA, martin_pall@wsu.edu 503-232-3883 May 17, 2018
Chapter 7: The Great Risks of 5G: What We Know and What We Don’t Know ( See the book for references)
We have already discussed two issues that are essential to understanding 5G. One is that pulsed EMFs are, in most cases, much more biologically active than are non-pulsed (often called continuous wave) EMFs. A second is that the EMFs act by putting forces on the voltage sensor of the VGCCs, opening these calcium channels and allowing excessive calcium ions to flow into the cell. The voltage sensor is extraordinarily sensitive to those electrical forces, such that the safety guidelines are allowing us to be exposed to EMFs that are something like 7.2 million times too high.
The reason that the industry has decided to go to the extremely high frequencies of 5G is that with such extremely high frequencies, it is possible to carry much more information via much more pulsation than it is possible to carry with lower frequencies even in the microwave range. We can be assured, therefore, that 5G will involve vastly more pulsation than do EMFs that we are currently exposed to. It follows from that, that any biological safety test of 5G must use the very rapid pulsations including whatever very short term spikes may be present, that are to be present in genuine 5G. There is an additional process that is planned to be used in 5G: phased arrays (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phased_array).
Here multiple antenna elements act together to produce highly pulsed fields which are designed for 5G, to produce increased penetration. 5G will entail particularly powerful pulsations to be used, which may, therefore, be particularly hazardous.
The only data we have, to my knowledge, on millimeter wave frequencies of 5G used non-pulsed EMFs in the millimeter frequency range of 5G, not genuine 5G. Such millimeter waves have been shown to produce a number of downstream effects of VGCC activation. One millimeter wave study showed that it activated both the VGCCs and also the voltage-gated potassium channels, suggesting that it worked via the voltage sensor, as do other EMFs [136]. Any such data tells us almost nothing about how biologically active genuine very highly pulsed 5G will be.
I take it that from their statements, that both Mr. Ryan and Dr. Vinciūnas are ready to put out 10s of millions of 5G antennae to afflict every single person in the EU with 5G radiation without even a single biological test of safety of genuine 5G. In the U.S., the FCC has taken a much worse position. The FCC is not only willing to allow such completely untested exposures but has also been has been aggressively pushing to promote installation of 5G antennae, such that antennae are already being installed in parts of the U.S. In a world where shocking behavior has become less and less shocking, I consider EU and U.S. views and actions to be shocking.
The U.S. situation is mass insanity. I would have hoped that the Europeans, who think of themselves as being much more thoughtful than Americans, would have been genuinely more thoughtful.
Why does 5G need such high numbers of antennae? It is because the 5G radiation is much more absorbed as it enters various materials. The approach is to use many more antennae with one found every few houses, such that 5G can sufficiently penetrate local walls. Such absorption usually involves the interaction with electrically charged groups, such that such high absorption is likely to involve placing forces on electrically charged groups.
Because such forces are the way in which EMFs activate the VGCCs, it seems highly likely, therefore, that 5G radiation will be particularly active in VGCC activation.
In summary, then, 5G is predicted to be particularly dangerous for each of four different reasons:
1 The extraordinarily high numbers of antennae that are planned.
2 The very high energy outputs which will be used to ensure penetration.
3 The extraordinarily high pulsation levels.
4 The apparent high level interactions of the 5G frequency on charged groups presumably including the voltage sensor charged groups.
Now what the telecommunications industry argues is that 5G radiation will be mostly absorbed in the outer 1 or 2 mm of the body, such that they claim that we don’t have to worry about the effects. There is some truth to that, but there are also some caveats that make any conclusions made from that, much more suspect. In any case, these surface effects of 5G will have especially strong impact on organisms with much higher surface to volume ratios.
Consequently, I predict that many organisms will be much more impacted than we will.
This includes insects and other arthropods, birds and small mammals and amphibia. It includes plants including even large trees, because trees have leaves and reproductive organs that are highly exposed. I predict there will be major ecological disasters as a consequence of 5G.
This will include vast conflagrations because EMF exposures make plants much more flammable.
But let’s get back to humans. The industry has also made claims that more conventional microwave frequency EMFs are limited in effect to the outer 1 cm of the body. We know that is not true, however because of the effects deep in the human brain, on the heart and on hormone systems.
Perhaps the most important two studies demonstrating effects deep within the body are the studies of Professor Hässig and his colleagues in Switzerland on cataract formation in newborn calves [137,138].
These two studies clearly show that when pregnant cows are grazing near mobile phone base stations (also called cell phone towers), the calves are born with very greatly increased incidences of cataracts. It follows from these findings that even though the developing fetuses are very deep in the body of the mother and should be highly protected from the EMF exposures, they are not so protected. And because the EMF safety guidelines in Switzerland are 100 times more stringent than are the safety guidelines in most of the rest of Europe, in the U.S., Canada and most of the rest of the world, the more general safety guidelines allow greatly excessive exposures and penetration of effects. The claims of industry that microwave frequency EMFs only act in the outer centimeter of the body are clearly false.
How then can both conventional microwave frequency EMFs and 5G radiation act deeply within the body? You may correctly observe that the electrical effects of the EMFs activate the voltage sensor and that the direct electrical forces are rapidly attenuated in the body.
So how can we get deep effects?
I think the answer is that the magnetic parts of the EMFs have been known for decades to penetrate much more deeply than do the electrical parts. The magnetic fields put forces on mobile electrically charged groups dissolved in the aqueous phases of the body and small individual movements of the charged groups can regenerate electric fields that are essentially identical to the electric fields of the original EMFs, carrying the same frequency and same pulsation pattern, although with lower intensity. An example of this is given in the Lu and Ueno [139] study. Because the voltage sensor is so stunningly sensitive to electrical forces and part of the reason for that is the very high level of amplification of the electrical field across the plasma membrane, we have an almost perfect way in which to produce EMF effects deeply within our bodies.
I am very concerned that 5G may produce effects like those we already see produced from lower frequency EMFs but are much more severe. I am also concerned that we will also see responses that are qualitatively different. Let me give you three possible examples of the latter type and one quantitative example.
Each of the four types of blindness, have downstream effects of VGCC activation as causal factors: cataracts, detached retinas, glaucoma and macular degeneration. The aqueous and vitreous humors in the eye may be an ideal environment for the regeneration of the electrical fields within the eye.
We may, therefore have a gigantic epidemic of each of the four types of blindness.
Another concern focuses on kidney dysfunction, which was shown in Chapter 5 to be impacted by EMFs. The kidneys have much fluid, both blood and also what will become urine, which may allow efficient the regeneration of electrical fields. Such regeneration may be expected to impact both the glomerular filtration and also the reabsorption, both essential to kidney function.
Does this mean that 5G will produce very large increases in kidney failure?
The only way to find out is to do biological safety testing of genuine 5G radiation. Let me give you a third example.
Fetuses and very young babies have much more water in their bodies than do adults.
Therefore, they may be a special risk for impacts of 5G, because of great increases in the regeneration of the electrical fields. Here one can think of all kinds of possibilities. Let me suggest two. We may have a gigantic (sorry about using that word again) epidemic of spontaneous abortion due the teratogenic effects. Another possibility is that instead of autism being one birth in 38, however horrendous that is, it could be one out of two, or even a majority of births. I don’t know that these will happen, but these are the kinds of risks we are taking and there are many others one can think of. Putting in tens of millions of 5G antennae without a single biological test of safety has got to be about the stupidest idea anyone has had in the history of the world.
This brings us back to the earlier point. The only way to do 5G safety testing is to do genuine 5G biological safety testing. I have published on how this can be done relatively easily at relatively low cost and have, as you saw in the Chapter 6, told the FCC how this can be done. Those tests must be done by organizations completely independent of industry and that leaves out both ICNIRP and SCENIHR and a lot of other organizations.
Now we will get into the precautionary principle which is specially relevant to the EU but may have lessons for all of us.
Dr. Vinciūnas’ last full paragraph reads as follows:
“The recourse to the EU’s precautionary principle to stop distribution of 5G products appears too drastic a measure. We need first to see how this technology will be applied and how the scientific evidence will evolve. Please be assured that the Commission will keep abreast of the scientific evidence in view of safeguarding the health of European citizens at the highest level possible and in line with its mandate.”
Article 191 defines the Precautionary Principle as follows:
“According to the European Commission the precautionary principle may be invoked when a phenomenon, product or process may have a dangerous effect, identified by a scientific and objective evaluation, if this evaluation does not allow the risk to be determined with sufficient certainty.
Recourse to the principle belongs in the general framework of risk analysis (which, besides risk evaluation, includes risk management and risk communication), and more particularly in the context of risk management which corresponds to the decision-making phase.
The Commission stresses that the precautionary principle may only be invoked in the event of a potential risk and that it can never justify arbitrary decisions. The precautionary principle may only be invoked when the three preliminary conditions are met:
* identification of potentially adverse effects;
* evaluation of the scientific data available;
* the extent of scientific uncertainty.”
The question now is what about 5G?
We have with 5G strong suspicions of similar or much more severe risk of effects documented elsewhere in this document. We have no biological safety testing of genuine 5G radiation. Therefore, we have no risk analysis or risk management because we have no risk assessment whatsoever on 5G.
So here we have Dr. Vinciūnas arguing that the request for precautionary principle application is premature. But it is not the request for the use of the precautionary principle that is premature, it is the Commission’s claim that it has done the required risk analysis and risk assessment.
This is the bizarre world that we live in.
The European Commission has done nothing to protect European citizens from the very serious health hazards and the U.S. FDA, EPA and National Cancer Institute have done nothing to protect U.S. citizens.
The U.S. FCC has been worse than that, acting in wanton disregard for our health.
Let me close, as follows. There have been certain points in our history where people have stood up to strong destructive forces against what often appeared to be insurmountable odds. Those people are THE most honored people in our history.
The people who failed to do so are among the most despised people in our history.
I am not at all sure we will have historians to record us 100 years from now or even 30 years from now, given the direction in which we are heading. But if we do, rest assured that these are the standards by which we will all be judged.
See Also:
Electromagnetic @ Phi Beta Iota
Source:
phibetaiota.net/2019/03/dr-martin-pall-5g-criminally-insane-electromagnetic-fields-emf-fry-living-things/?fbclid=IwAR1MNd0TXwt2DeZuvVcskB8RupchTsBcPJmFVDahmTZdvmsLPUoLu6C7AbI
CORONAVIRUS HOAX : AGENDA 21/30
What you need to know about Coronavirus, “Pandemics”, 5G, 60 ghz millimetre waves and vaccines…
Learn More: Watch Video:
Truthers Journal 